Impeach: conservative case

Impeach: conservative case

I have reviewed a book explaining the case for impeaching President Trump. The author considers himself a centrist – extreme centrist is the term he uses. The case is explained well.

If you are a Republican, you should not excuse a behavior in a fellow Republican that you would condemn in a Democrat. And if you are a Democrat, you should not excuse a behavior in a fellow Democrat that you would condemn in a Republican. Unfortunately we have seen little of that in the past few months of Impeachment hearings.

Another perspective from a conservative point of view is offered in today’s NY Times. The Conservative Case for Impeachment — and Removal by Bret Stephens is well worth reading.

Impeach: The Case Against Donald Trump

Impeach: The Case Against Donald Trump

My first thought was that it was amazing that Impeach: The Case Against Donald Trump by Neal Katyal with Sam Koppelman was so current. I’d expect a book of this type to be at least a few months out of date but it seems there was a heroic effort by the authors and research assistants to incorporate very recent events.

I like the book very much and agreed with much of it. Where I disagreed I was usually persuaded by the clear arguments presented in the book.
Continue reading “Impeach: The Case Against Donald Trump”

Where is the full transcript ?

Where is the full transcript ?

This July call by President Trump to the President of Ukraine seems to be the center of the Impeachment Inquiry so far. However all we have to go on is the a rough transcript released by the White House. The actual full transcript is on a very highly classified computer system.

Is it possible for someone from the Intelligence committees to read it? Could someone read or testify to the contents of other calls on that same system?

Andrew Johnson impeachment parallels

Andrew Johnson impeachment parallels

I was reading “Donald Trump, Meet Your Precursor”, a nice opinion piece that will be in the Sunday NY Times but was available online yesterday. The article discusses several parallels between President Johnson and President Trump, especially as related to impeachment.

It reminded me the several years back I had read and reviewed a biography of Andrew Johnson. I think it gave me a better appreciation of the article.

Mueller time

Mueller time

Is it time to re-examine the Mueller report ?

Now that a impeachment inquiry is under way and early results strongly suggest that President Trump was using his office for political gain, is it not reasonable that we consider that he may have done something similar in 2016?. After all Mueller did document multiple contacts between the campaign and Russia. And our intelligence agencies agree that Russia did interfere in the 2016 election. If this possible collusion is to be investigated as part of the inquiry, should the unredacted Mueller report be released to the relevant committees?
Continue reading “Mueller time”

Is this the behavior of an innocent President ?

Is this the behavior of an innocent President ?

Why is President Trump trying to stop people from his administration from testifying in the impeachment inquiry? There is plenty of evidence presented of his guilty behavior in Ukraine call and related events. It seemed to be extortion or bribery depending on how you look at it but he insists the call was “perfect”. So far his Republican allies are standing by him.

He has ordered several potential witnesses from the White House not to testify. If he thinks he is innocent, why do this? On the other hand, it may be obstruction or just a sign of guilt.

Is this the behavior of an innocent President?

Fact or Fiction in the Impeachment Inquiry

Fact or Fiction in the Impeachment Inquiry

So far in the Impeachment Inquiry, it seems as if the Democratic members of the House Intelligence Committee are more interested in obtaining facts while the Republican members are more interested in fiction which misleads the public and defends President Trump.

We have heard from several witnesses and the picture that emerges keeps getting worse for the President. And Republicans keep try to defend him with misleading claims and constantly changing stories.
Continue reading “Fact or Fiction in the Impeachment Inquiry”

Republicans defend from impeachment by misleading

Republicans defend from impeachment by misleading

President Trump’s defenders like to spin the facts to mislead the public and maybe even fool themselves. This seems to be their way to defend the President’s behavior that has led to the impeachment inquiry.

Here is a fact check on some of the misleading claims –

https://www.factcheck.org/2019/11/scalise-spins-facts-on-security-aid/

Senator Amy Klobuchar’s Book

Senator Amy Klobuchar’s Book

After reading about the many candidates running in the Democratic presidential primary and watching the primary debates, I decided that Senator Amy Klobuchar is the best candidate in that group. So I decided to read her book. The book is called The Senator Next Door: A Memoir from the Heartland.
Continue reading “Senator Amy Klobuchar’s Book”

Republican hypocrisy on first hand witnesses

Republican hypocrisy on first hand witnesses

Republicans hypocrisy again. We previously heard Republican complaints about the closed hearings and now open hearings in the impeachment inquiry. So far in the open hearings we have heard from several witnesses from the State Department about the effect on diplomacy and specifically their job as a result of President Trump’s actions.

As far as I can tell they have been very clear about what they know as a result of first hand information and what they believe based on what they have heard from others in the State Department.
Continue reading “Republican hypocrisy on first hand witnesses”

Amy Klobuchar for President

Amy Klobuchar for President

Anyone who has seen my previous writings on Donald Trump will not be surprised that I do not think President Trump should be re-elected.

So I have been watching the Democratic debates and doing a good amount of reading about the various candidates. And there certainly are quite a few who I think would be a much better president.

But among them I favor Senator Amy Klobuchar for several reasons. She has been a highly effective senator and has been able to work well with both Democrats and Republicans. She has won re-election in a state easily carried by Donald Trump in 2016. And unlike President Trump she will be a President for all Americans, not just “the base”.

She is more moderate in her approach than many Democrats in this primary race but often shares the same goals. For example, I think all the Democrats running favor getting to health care coverage for all Americans with guarantees for coverage of pre-existing conditions. Some think the way is Medicare for All but Amy would rather improve the Affordable Care Act to move us toward universal health care and lower costs. Her positions on health care and many other topics are discussed in Much more detail on her website, https://amyklobuchar.com/.

The New York Times has provided a much shorter profile of Senator Klobuchar. The link at the top of that page (Who’s Running) will lead you to information on candidates (both R and D) running for president.

Trump family sacrifices

Trump family sacrifices

In his new book Donald Trump Jr. recalled his family’s sacrifices for this country on a visit to Arlington Cemetery. Many of those buried there made the ultimate sacrifice for their country. Others served and made less but very real sacrifices.

As I think about this on Veterans’ Day, I am struck by the ridiculousness of the comparison.

I keep thinking about the tragedy of bone spurs.

What do republicans want?

What do republicans want?

First, they objected to the impeachment hearings being closed. Then when the resolution to make them open was passed they voted against that and then complained about open hearings.

President Trump said he would not cooperate with the impeachment hearings because the full House had not voted on it. Then when the House voted, he again objected and refused to cooperate.

What do republicans want?