Author: Jack
I retired in 2008 and so I have more time now to devote to several of my interests The blog here is mainly for my interests in some current events but may have the occasional rant on other subjects. I have also decided to keep my genealogy posts here instead of in a second blog (and so simplify my life a little).

A Little History of Science by William Bynum

A Little History of Science by William Bynum

A Little History of Science by William Bynum is hard book to review. But that is mostly because it is exactly what the title promises.


Science is a very big area. It would be impossible to cover it all in a very large set of books and certainly very hard to summarize in a large book but William Bynum attempts it in small book (about 270 pages). And succeeds!

I found myself fascinated by some parts and merely interested in others. But I think this is to be expected as the subject matter varies so greatly.

So I guess the reader is doomed to find parts that are of great interest which a reader would wish were covered in more detail. But that is the nature of short histories. This work gives us an overview of many areas of science. And if the reader is interested in any or several, he or she can explore those in more detail in other books.

I liked the book but am a bit unsure about a target audience. I am a retired scientist (human genetics) so I was already familiar with large parts of what was covered but this book did fill in some significant gaps. So I would say it is suitable for the adult reader who wants a quick view of areas of science they are not familiar with. This would range from someone with science knowledge (since there are not many who know it all) to someone who knows nothing of science but is curious. I think it would also be suitable for a teen interested in a quick overview of science.

Harmattan by Gavin Weston, an update

Harmattan by Gavin Weston, an update

Today I found a comment on my review of Harmattan by Gavin Weston with a notation that the commenter had reviewed this book on her blog and liked it as well. So since it had been a while since I reviewed the book and there were few other reviews then, I thought I would give an update with a list of reviews. By the way, I liked the book very much and thought the message very important.

First, for the latest information on the book, you might want to visit the author’s website, http://www.gavinwestonbooks.com/. On another site is also a guest blog by Gavin Weston about why he wrote this book.


I looked at Amazon and saw the Kindle edition is out (and only $5.99 when I looked) but the paperback won’t be released in the US until June, 2013. It is already out in the UK. So your options in the US appear to be buy the Kindle version or pre-order the paperback (or just wait). Or I guess you could buy from a non-US store and have it shipped.

That link is to the Kindle edition but you can easy move to the print edition if that is your preference.

So here are a few reviews I found:

All the reviews I’ve seen are favorable. I would say almost all reviewers think this is a very good book and/or highly recommend it. So at least now I know it is just not me. I hope Mr. Weston continues to write.

Thomas Jefferson: The Art of Power by Jon Meacham

Thomas Jefferson: The Art of Power by Jon Meacham

Thomas Jefferson: The Art of Power by Jon Meacham is a wonderful book. I had done some reading about Jefferson before but never a full-length biography. I had heard this was the best so I was eager to tackle it and I’m glad I did.

In my previous readings, I had always felt Jefferson was a very gifted man and with that rare ability to hold 2 contradictory beliefs in his mind without being a hypocrite. For example, he was firmly against the idea of political parties, yet the most partisan of politicians.

The list of these internal contradictions is massive. But Jon Meacham spends a good bit of time on the early Jefferson and his love of control and dislike of conflict. This was paired with a strong set of beliefs about what was right or ideals (Jefferson, the Philosopher) with a realization of what was possible and how to get there (Jefferson, the Politician). And the latter is the art of power as in the subtitle.

This is a large (but still 1 volume) biography. I have seen blurbs calling it the best but I’ll have to leave that judgement of others who are more qualified. I’ll just say that I enjoyed it and feel that I understand Jefferson much better than before.

Here are some other reviews:

The Christmas Kid: And Other Brooklyn Stories By Pete Hamill

The Christmas Kid: And Other Brooklyn Stories By Pete Hamill

I was born in the Bronx in 1950 and moved to the suburbs a few years later. I mention this little bit of personal history because I have read several of Hamill’s books as an adult and it always make me nostalgic for the New York that existed before I did.


In the introduction to The Christmas Kid: And Other Brooklyn Stories, Pete Hamill does identify nostalgia as New York City’s most enduring emotion and I understand that entirely. The city is a very special place but it seems it was always a bit better when our parents or perhaps just a decade or so before we were born.

A New Yorker or even a near New Yorker like me definitely feels the nostalgia. But anyone from anywhere could relate to these stories. Such is the magic of his storytelling. Although the stories are specifically about working-class people in a certain neighborhood, they are really universal.

Pete Hamill is one of my favorite authors so I was pretty sure I was going to like this book. And I liked it even more than I expected. This book is a collection of 36 short stories. Pete Hamill was raised in the tenements of a working-class area of Brooklyn and these stories are set in the Brooklyn of his youth which spanned the Depression and the Korean War. The author is gifted at telling us about the time, place, and characters.

Most of these stories were published in the Sunday Daily News in the early 1980s. The stories vary in length; several are 5 pages or so; some are about 15 pages. Some have happy endings; some don’t; but that’s the way it is.

The nice thing about a collection of short stories like this is that you can enjoy without much commitment. With a longer book, I often find myself in a situation where after reading 50 or even 100 pages that are just OK, I wonder if I really want to spend the time reading hundreds of pages than might be the same or might get better. With short stories the commitment is only a few more pages. By the way, there were no stories in this book that I even considered not finishing.

Definitely add this to your reading list if you like Pete Hamill’s other books. Give it a try if you are not a fan or maybe even never heard of Pete Hamill. Reading a few short stories is not a big investment of time and you may find a new author worth following.

Ratlines by Stuart Neville

Ratlines by Stuart Neville

Based on a little known and disturbing aspect of Irish history and a mix of real and fictional characters, “Ratlines” by Stuart Neville is an intriguing story.

This is clearly a work of fiction. At the beginning he lays out a few historical events. And then tells you:

The rest is just a story

But what a story.

First, the historical events that inspired this story. As I said some facts are given in the beginning of the book and then in the Acknowledgements at the end, the author list a few sources of the history including a documentary you can find on YouTube

Or if you prefer reading about this
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/1538969/Ireland-welcomed-Hitlers-henchmen.html


So with a base of real characters, Neville adds fictional characters and fictional events and weaves a complicated tale of intrigue involving Nazis, the IRA, Irish intelligence, a love story, and much more. What makes it more interesting to Americans is that this story mainly takes place during the preparations for President Kennedy’s visit to Ireland.

As would be expected in a story involving Nazis, the IRA, and Stuart Neville, there is violence. But as in his previous books (reviewed here: The Ghosts of Belfast and Collusion), the violence seems to fit into the story which is more about right and wrong (often the lesser of two wrongs) and a complex character dealing with inner conflict.

In this book the complex character is Lieutenant Albert Ryan of Irish Intelligence, who left neutral Ireland to fight the Nazis for the British and now is asked by his government to protect Nazi war criminals in Ireland such as Colonel Otto Skorzeny (formerly an SS officer and now a well-connected resident of Ireland.)

I read the galley from netgalley on my Kindle and the book won’t be released until early January, 2013. I guess my only real disappointment is that the book won’t be available this year for gift giving.

Other reviews:

The book is published by Soho Crime. If you like good books, especially with an international flavor, you might want to check out Soho Press.

A Splash of Red By Gabriel Cohen

A Splash of Red By Gabriel Cohen

I signed up for Gabriel Cohen’s email list and I’m glad I did.  For those not familiar with the author, Gabriel Cohen is a writer living in Brooklyn who has written several books about a Brooklyn-based homicide detective.

I have reviewed all 4 to date here.

I have enjoyed them all and I’ve been waiting for the next in the series. So what does this have to do with the list? The author has his own website at http://www.gabrielcohenbooks.com.

And you can sign up for emails there. You don’t get many. This is the first I’ve gotten in a while and it was so good I decided to blog about it.

I was hoping for a notice that a new book was coming and maybe an invitation to be an advanced reader. I think what I got was almost as good, but some might actually say better. Mr. Cohen has written a nonfiction piece for a new website.

I totally enjoyed “A Splash of Red” which is a free read at http://narrative.ly/2012/09/a-splash-of-red/. It starts with the writer looking for an affordable apartment, and quickly progresses to a crime writer living at a crime scene. I say quickly because it is not a very long piece. It is a great story and certainly worth a few minutes of your time.

While there be sure to check out the rest of the Narratively website. It is an interesting web publication of true stories. Did I mention it is free? If you are so inclined you may support the project but the site is free and open to all.

Pennsylvania parties and independents

Pennsylvania parties and independents

Apparently the concept of the independent voters or candidates hasn’t quite made it to Pennsylvania. The parties do have lock on things political here and it is a bit difficult for those of us who choose not to be either Republican or Democrat.

A short article by Anthony R. Wood in the Philadelphia Inquirer of August 7 begins this way –

When Jim Foster showed up with his 125-page petition to run for Congress against Chaka Fattah (D., Pa.), state elections officials rejected his signatures on the ground that another member of his party already had a candidate.

Since Foster doesn’t belong to a party, he was flabbergasted. He was filing as an “independent.”

There was already an “Independent” who had qualified the day before and the state would not allow 2 people from the same or similarly named parties to run in the same race lest the voters be confused. Apparently the Department of State of Pennsylvania cannot fathom that “independent” and “Independent” are not 2 parties with similar names but rather individuals who are not part of a party.

There is more to the story than I will discuss here so if you have an interest in Pennsylvania politics you might find it worth reading.

But for this story, the main point is that it went to court. And a follow-up story, gave us a bit more on this.

Most people would think it fairly obvious that “independent” and “Independent” are not 2 parties with similar names but the law seems to lack a certain degree of common sense at times. Unfortunately, this is one of those times.

The court did find that Mr. Foster could run but could not be an independent. He would have to identify with a made up party such as the “Philadelphia Party”. But if the first filer for the “Independent” slot was disqualified, Mr. Foster could be the “Independent” candidate. A mixed and rather absurd result in my opinion but then I can think about it logically rather than in terms of Pennsylvania law.

Name that socialist, a taxing question about partisanship

Name that socialist, a taxing question about partisanship

I want to begin with a quote.

We’re going to close the unproductive tax loopholes that have allowed some of the truly wealthy to avoid paying their fair share. In theory, some of those loopholes were understandable, but in practice they sometimes made it possible for millionaires to pay nothing, while a bus driver was paying 10 percent of his salary, and that’s crazy. It’s time we stopped it.

And the way I see it, if our current tax structure were a TV show, it would either be “Foul-ups, Bleeps, and Blunders,” or “Gimme a Break.” If it were a record album, it would be “Gimme Shelter.” If it were a movie, it would be “Revenge of the Nerds” or maybe “Take the Money and Run.” And if the IRS, Internal Revenue Service, ever wants a theme song, maybe they’ll get Sting to do, “Every breath you take, every move you make, I’ll be watching you.”

What we’re trying to move against is institutionalized unfairness. We want to see that everyone pays their fair share, and no one gets a free ride. Our reasons? It’s good for society when we all know that no one is manipulating the system to their advantage because they’re rich and powerful. But it’s also good for society when everyone pays something, that everyone makes a contribution.

After all, we’re all citizens, equal in the eyes of the law, and equal in the eyes of God. You’re given a lot of benefits when you’re born in the U.S.A, but you’re given a responsibility, too, a responsibility to do your part and become a contributing member of the American family and an equal partner in America, Incorporated. When you pay your taxes, you buy your shares. And every year you get to vote on who should be on the board of directors.

Now, you’ll be hearing more about our tax proposals over the next few weeks. A great debate has begun, and there will be much talk, pro and con. And that’s good, that’s what America’s all about.

Who said that? If you are of a certain political persuasion, you might have guessed it was that socialist Barack Obama. Or maybe it was a quote from a socialist newspaper or some other left wing politician. But it was Ronald Reagan at Northside High School in Atlanta, Georgia on June 6, 1985. The entire speech is in the Reagan archives maintained by The University of Texas at Austin.

I have 2 points. The Republican view of taxation was very different in Ronald Reagan’s day. And because the Republican party has moved so far to the right, the 2 parties cannot even have a serious discussion of this or other issues .

The extreme partisanship in the electorate is bad. The extreme partisanship in Congress is damaging. Perhaps, one of the things we need to think about in the election this fall is reducing extreme partisanship. Think about which candidate for any office is willing to debate and compromise.

Twilight of the Elites: America after Meritocracy by Christopher Hayes

Twilight of the Elites: America after Meritocracy by Christopher Hayes

Twilight of the Elites: America after Meritocracy by Christopher Hayes is a book well-worth your time. Most of us are unhappy to one degree or another with our society. During the past 10 years or so we have seen many failures and that is the starting point of the book. But what is the solution? I still don’t know. To be honest about it, I really didn’t expect one book to have all the answers but this is a good start in identifying some of the problems and suggesting some possible solutions or at least some improvements.
Continue reading “Twilight of the Elites: America after Meritocracy by Christopher Hayes”

Presidential Politics – a moderate Republican view and new blog

Presidential Politics – a moderate Republican view and new blog

I just ran across an interesting blog post called Why I am an Obama Republican . This seems to be a relatively new Blog and may be worth a look if you are interested in a moderate republican view of presidential politics.

Yesterday (August 1, 2012) a date that shall live in infamy

Yesterday (August 1, 2012) a date that shall live in infamy

According to Rep. Mike Kelly (R-Pa.), yesterday (August 1, 2012) was a date that shall live in infamy. What terrible thing happened that made it comparable to the great loss of life on September 11, 2001 and December 7, 1941 ?

Why it was the implementation of a provision of the Affordable Care Act (Obamacare) ? Now most folks won’t think this is as terrible as the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 or the attack on Pearl Harbor that got us into World War 2 but at least 1 republican representative thinks so.

What was this dastardly provision that is so terrible? It is the provision of preventive health services to women( avert your eyes for the rest of this sentence if you are squeamish) which includes contraception. Surely a terrible thing and a good reason for this date to live in infamy.

Here is the story of CBS News which includes a video of the Congressman. Here is an annoucement from Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary of Health and Human Services in case you are interested what this provision is actually about.

As I mentioned before this is a complicated issue but “date that shall live in infamy” is a bit over the top.

Chick-fil-a and free speech

Chick-fil-a and free speech

I like my Chick-fil-a lunches. I like the food, I like some of the the ads because they are clever and so different, I respect the Chick-fil-a company and believe the owners do have a right to an opinion and should be able to express that opinion without repercussions from the goverment.

We all have a right to an opinion and should be allowed to express it. It is called “free speech” and is one of our rights as Americans. I disagree with the anti-gay marriage stance of company president Dan Cathy but he has every right to his opinion and neither he nor the company should not be punished for expressing it by any government entity.

Others are also have the same rights to an opinion and are free to patronize or not patronize Chick-fil-a but the government should not violate anyone’s right to express an opinion.

Do we improve the healthcare law or repeal and replace?

Do we improve the healthcare law or repeal and replace?

Now that the healthcare law or the Affordable Care Act (ACA) has been upheld by the Supreme Court, the ball is once again in the hands of Congress.

Should we improve the law? Many people support aspects of the law but may oppose others. Perhaps they should encourage Congressmen to try for improvements. I will use the term Congressmen to include women just because “Congress persons” sounds awkward and I cannot think of a good inclusive term (Comments to suggest alternatives, anyone?) Maybe even replace those Congressmen who are not interested in improving the current healthcare law.

There are those who like the idea of repeal and replace. They would reject the law because there are parts they disagree with and trust Congress to replace it with something better. Not a very bright idea, in my opinion.

There are those who just want to repeal the law. Are they really happy with the current system? Do they think it is a good idea that many are uninsured, we have the most expensive system in the world, and certainly far from the best results? Not a good value in my opinion but then I don’t own an insurance company.

Political telephone calls – Georgia Voter

Political telephone calls – Georgia Voter

I am no longer an Georgia resident but they call anyway. I suppose there have been close to a dozen call in the past few days. Mostly I hang-up after a few words of the recorded message.

But this morning I actually listened to one. It was from the Metropolitan Atlanta Voter Education Network (or something similar). Very positive, just informed you about an upcoming referendum on transportation and urged you to get informed about it and vote. I’ve gotten quite a few others in the past few days but since I didn’t listen to much of any of them, I’m not sure if they were related to this issue, this group, or something else going on in Georgia.

But my point is that these organizations or candidates could probably save some money by not calling out of state. I lived in Geogia for 30 years but moved to Pennsylvania for over 4 years and now have a new telephone number with a Pennsylvania area code . I suppose they got the new number from some sort of updating service. But is that really a good idea?

I suppose there is an outside chance that they are thinking I could be one of those folks with 2 or more homes and still vote in Georgia. But if that was the case I think I could afford a telephone in each home.

Political ads

Political ads

I’m not sure if it is the Philadelphia market or that I’ve just been lucky because I haven’t watched that much TV lately. I was watching more in the spring and I did see a large number of ads on TV and most were negative. During the Republican primary season, they seemed to be mostly negative ads either for against Mitt Romney. Ane then they were about the Presdential race but either Romney against Obama or Obama against Romney and largely negative.

But last night there was an Obama ad on while I was watching the Olympics and it seemed very positive as compared to what I had been seeing. The President seemed to be drawing a sharp contrast between Mitt Romney’s economic ideas and his, and telling the voters they had an important choice to make. Of course, in 1 minute (or maybe it was less), you cannot go into too much depth. And you can’t really expect either side to be very positive about the opposition ideas. But still, it may be the start of a reasonable discussion.

Can we look forward to a serious discussion of the issues ?